London UK Estd 1980 Editor Muhammad Haque
AADHIKARonline
AADHIKAR
means
RIGHTS
It is a trans Asian word. Or, AADHIKAR is a word that is present in many Asian languages and it means the same thing, with only very slight or very minor variations in the applications. Its particular phonetic identity was created and then introduced into the English language and vocabulary in December 1980 by Muhammad Haque while founding the weekly AADHIKAR, published from London on 19 December 1980.
AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATON, London, UK. Publishing these editions in London in association with Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill [The ‘Crossrail Bill’ in the UK House of Commons as at Friday 30 June 2006]
http://www.khoodeelaar.com
The 4th Edition 1535Hrs GMT / 1635 Hrs UK Friday 30 June 2006
Editor in Chief
Muhammad Haque
E-mail
aadhikaronline@yahoo.co.uk
To REQUEST ARCHIVED issues and copies of AADHIKAR and Khoodeelaar! online publications, e-mail your details to
aadhikararchives@yahoo.co.uk
AADHIKARonline and KHOODEELAAR! Legal disclaimer updated at 1330 Hrs GMT on Thursday 22 June 2006 is available via
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikardailyonline/today.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole plan scheme project Bill in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area – campaign news, commentary and legal action programme updates on Friday 30 June 2006
Coming here shortly
KHOODEELAAR NO to CrossRail Bill campaign - Breaking news-brief
Khoodeelaar! Complaints against House of Commons 'Crossrail Bill' 'Select committee' conduct and racist obstructions, now being looked into by the Speaker’s office
- Further reports on the incidents concerned here shortly
Court action starts in the week beginning on Monday 3 July 2006 against Tower Hamlets Council – details here in due course
Why the community’s defence against the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council and the unrepresentative London mayor and the GLA cannot be realised without continuing, consistent moral and ethical action – a report here shortly
What is George Galloway’s ‘party’ position on Crossrail?
What is George Galloway’s own position on ‘Crossrail’ in light of the absence of any reference to ‘Crossrail’ from the ‘RESPECT’ web site for ages
“Your search - Crossrail+Galloway - did not match any documents. “+”Your search - Crossrail+George Galloway - did not match any documents.
Suggestions: Make sure all words are spelled correctly. Try different keywords. Try more general keywords. Try fewer keywords. Also, you can browse today's headlines on the Google News homepage.
”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the previous editions, as published on Thursday 29 June 2006
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail – legal action programme
Updates and details – Thursday 29 June 2006
Scope of the legal action programme
The defendants list – the prime suspects are the following
Christine, the Tower Hamlets Council chief executive and her ‘line—managed’ personnel concerned in the entire series of Crossrail -hole-inviting plots including in the concealment of facts or Crossrail assault in the East End; the mayor of London ken Livingstone for his role in lying and fabricating and in his recruitment of liars from the ranks of holders of ‘elected’ office from across the East End of London in particular; the Five Tower Hamlets Councillors who lied and who failed to do their democratic duty and allowed the lying employees or contractors or agents of Tower Hamlets Council to make secret deals against the community in the East End: the same councillors who took bribes from Crossrail directly or indirectly and who committed series of acts of criminal fabrication and of tampering with evidence for Crossrail
[Further updates, summaries and reports during Thursday 29 June 2006]
By © Muhammad Haque, The Organiser, Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole plan scheme project Bill campaign KHOODEELAAR! diagnosis of the deep-seated lies for Crossrail as retailed in the 'East London Idiotiser' issue dated Thursday 29 June 2006 The strange case of the East London’s ‘local paper’ the East London Advertiser, becoming so persistently factually inaccurate and wrong on Crossrail that Khoodeelaar! has resumed its long running investigation into the role that that publication ahs been playing in the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End…
The lie in the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER’s [FrontPage of the 'East London Advertiser' Thursday 29 June 2006 - 'Crossrail homes threat 'news' item] use of a particular word is the fact that they have never acknowledged the work on the economic, social and the constitutional unacceptability of the CrossRail plan which the KHOODEELAAR! Organiser has done. One of the analytical and factual points that KHOODEELAAR! has made is that the whole CrossRail plan has been a sneaky affair, from start to finish.
And that the deals, the contacts, the communications, the bribery between the tower hamlets council and the CLRL [Cross London Rail Links Ltd] and their co-promoters of the idiotic wasteful scheme.
1. The number of things that are wrong with today’s edition of the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER running that piece for tower hamlets council is too many. 2. The use of the word ‘row’ is totally completely and comprehensively wrong. It is most misleading and most untrue. It is also not supported, let alone being substantiated by the evidence of the dealings between the crooks inside tower hamlets council who have lied to the community for the CrossRail hole plot and their counterparts within CLRL [Cross London Rail Links Ltd] or in the DfT or in TfL or in any other part of the corrupt establishment. 3. Tower hamlets council has never had a row about the main, the core, the central CrossRail hole attacks plan and programme on the east end. Even the published traceable record of the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER itself will support the conclusion that the display and the words on today’s EAST LONDON IDIOTISER were misleading, inaccurate, contradictory and wrong. 4. The contents of the actual item were also disproportionately misleading about the main campaign against the CrossRail assault on the east end, There is no ‘editorial’ ‘journalistic’ ‘ethical’, literary’ ‘textual’, 'conceptual’ informational, technical, technological, perceptional reason why the item could not have been instead about the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign that has gone on in heightened mode over the past three weeks in the context of the four main facets of the campaign events, activities and communications and participations and publications. 5. None of the components of the alleged facts that allegedly made up the alleged row between the crooked clique in control of tower hamlets council at the given, the material and the relevant CrossRail-hole-deal time/s and the crooked CLRL [Cross London Rail Links Ltd] and their co-promoters of the crass crassrail hole project, constituted even a fraction of the substance of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign actions that took place in the six days prior to the publication of this edition of the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER [THURSDAY 29 JUNE 2006] 6. The use of ‘sneaky change of plan’ is indicative of the belief on the part of the ‘editorial’ decision-makers responsible for the main headline and the subheading ‘council in row with CrossRail over ‘devastating’ new sewer plans’ that the rest of the contacts and agreements between the council and CrossRail were straight or that the particular sneaky one was so outrageous and so out of proportion to the rest of the deals and agreements or planning that it caused a ‘legitimate’ ‘row’. 7. The placing of the idea of a ‘row’ also indicates the acceptance on the part of the same decision-makers on the Idiotiser of a marketing line for the crooked tower hamlets council that that council is on the whole and normally above sneaky conduct itself. 8. Whichever - or whatever- construction is taken as based on the actual headline and the display and the use of the word ‘row’ in the context of the item and the publication [not forgetting the trailer posted in streets across the area on Wednesday 28 June 2006] it is inevitable that the impression that the reader would get, the person whose main or the only ‘source’ of ‘news’ about what was going on in the area as covered by the Idiotiser, would be the wrong impression, would be the untrue impression, the inaccurate impression, the impression that would cause a new or add to an old [= existing] deficit of information about the true state of affairs in the area generally and on the matter of the CrossRail hole assault and the role of the CrossRail-hole council in bringing about that assault via CrossRail. 9. The item ‘sneaky change of plan’ is also a gigantic lie for the corrupt tower hamlets council and for the corrupt CLRL [Cross London Rail Links Ltd] and for all the assorted elements of crassrail lies that have plugged away for the crass CrossRail hole attack on the east end. Every single time, the CrossRail hole council and CLRL [Cross London Rail Links Ltd] has acted sneakily. And the main ones KHOODEELAAR! ” has repeatedly drawn to the attention of the el Idiotiser. The Idiotiser has failed to see those and has refused to acknowledge those, as they have failed to acknowledge most of the truth of our campaign. It is a gigantic lie because it suggests that ‘sneak change of plan’ was a one off. 10. Any honest student of economics, as the reporter has described himself as being, would have done their home work and have acquainted themselves with the information on the economic irrelevance of CrossRail that the KHOODEELAAR! Organiser has actually carried out and published over the past 30 months. There is on the record no other commentator on CrossRail that has done so much detailed study of the economic freelance and disbenefits of CrossRail. The lie in the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER’s use is the fact that they have never acknowledged the work on the economic, social and the constitutional unacceptability of the CrossRail plan which the KHOODEELAAR! Organiser has done. One of the analytical and factual points that KHOODEELAAR! has made is that the whole CrossRail plan has been a sneaky affair, from start to finish. And that the deals, the contacts, the communications, the bribery between the tower hamlets council and the CLRL [Cross London Rail Links Ltd] and their co-promoters of the idiotic wasteful scheme.
Ends part 2 of the diagnosis of the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER plug for the CROSSRAIL hole plan liars on TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL Wednesday 29 June 2006
.
[To be continued]
AADHIKAR
means
RIGHTS
It is a trans Asian word. Or, AADHIKAR is a word that is present in many Asian languages and it means the same thing, with only very slight or very minor variations in the applications. Its particular phonetic identity was created and then introduced into the English language and vocabulary in December 1980 by Muhammad Haque while founding the weekly AADHIKAR, published from London on 19 December 1980.
AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATON, London, UK. Publishing these editions in London in association with Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill [The ‘Crossrail Bill’ in the UK House of Commons as at Friday 30 June 2006]
http://www.khoodeelaar.com
The 4th Edition 1535Hrs GMT / 1635 Hrs UK Friday 30 June 2006
Editor in Chief
Muhammad Haque
aadhikaronline@yahoo.co.uk
To REQUEST ARCHIVED issues and copies of AADHIKAR and Khoodeelaar! online publications, e-mail your details to
aadhikararchives@yahoo.co.uk
AADHIKARonline and KHOODEELAAR! Legal disclaimer updated at 1330 Hrs GMT on Thursday 22 June 2006 is available via
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikardailyonline/today.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole plan scheme project Bill in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area – campaign news, commentary and legal action programme updates on Friday 30 June 2006
Coming here shortly
KHOODEELAAR NO to CrossRail Bill campaign - Breaking news-brief
Khoodeelaar! Complaints against House of Commons 'Crossrail Bill' 'Select committee' conduct and racist obstructions, now being looked into by the Speaker’s office
- Further reports on the incidents concerned here shortly
Court action starts in the week beginning on Monday 3 July 2006 against Tower Hamlets Council – details here in due course
Why the community’s defence against the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council and the unrepresentative London mayor and the GLA cannot be realised without continuing, consistent moral and ethical action – a report here shortly
What is George Galloway’s ‘party’ position on Crossrail?
What is George Galloway’s own position on ‘Crossrail’ in light of the absence of any reference to ‘Crossrail’ from the ‘RESPECT’ web site for ages
“Your search - Crossrail+Galloway - did not match any documents. “+”Your search - Crossrail+George Galloway - did not match any documents.
Suggestions: Make sure all words are spelled correctly. Try different keywords. Try more general keywords. Try fewer keywords. Also, you can browse today's headlines on the Google News homepage.
”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the previous editions, as published on Thursday 29 June 2006
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail – legal action programme
Updates and details – Thursday 29 June 2006
Scope of the legal action programme
The defendants list – the prime suspects are the following
Christine, the Tower Hamlets Council chief executive and her ‘line—managed’ personnel concerned in the entire series of Crossrail -hole-inviting plots including in the concealment of facts or Crossrail assault in the East End; the mayor of London ken Livingstone for his role in lying and fabricating and in his recruitment of liars from the ranks of holders of ‘elected’ office from across the East End of London in particular; the Five Tower Hamlets Councillors who lied and who failed to do their democratic duty and allowed the lying employees or contractors or agents of Tower Hamlets Council to make secret deals against the community in the East End: the same councillors who took bribes from Crossrail directly or indirectly and who committed series of acts of criminal fabrication and of tampering with evidence for Crossrail
[Further updates, summaries and reports during Thursday 29 June 2006]
By © Muhammad Haque, The Organiser, Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole plan scheme project Bill campaign KHOODEELAAR! diagnosis of the deep-seated lies for Crossrail as retailed in the 'East London Idiotiser' issue dated Thursday 29 June 2006 The strange case of the East London’s ‘local paper’ the East London Advertiser, becoming so persistently factually inaccurate and wrong on Crossrail that Khoodeelaar! has resumed its long running investigation into the role that that publication ahs been playing in the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End…
The lie in the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER’s [FrontPage of the 'East London Advertiser' Thursday 29 June 2006 - 'Crossrail homes threat 'news' item] use of a particular word is the fact that they have never acknowledged the work on the economic, social and the constitutional unacceptability of the CrossRail plan which the KHOODEELAAR! Organiser has done. One of the analytical and factual points that KHOODEELAAR! has made is that the whole CrossRail plan has been a sneaky affair, from start to finish.
And that the deals, the contacts, the communications, the bribery between the tower hamlets council and the CLRL [Cross London Rail Links Ltd] and their co-promoters of the idiotic wasteful scheme.
1. The number of things that are wrong with today’s edition of the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER running that piece for tower hamlets council is too many. 2. The use of the word ‘row’ is totally completely and comprehensively wrong. It is most misleading and most untrue. It is also not supported, let alone being substantiated by the evidence of the dealings between the crooks inside tower hamlets council who have lied to the community for the CrossRail hole plot and their counterparts within CLRL [Cross London Rail Links Ltd] or in the DfT or in TfL or in any other part of the corrupt establishment. 3. Tower hamlets council has never had a row about the main, the core, the central CrossRail hole attacks plan and programme on the east end. Even the published traceable record of the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER itself will support the conclusion that the display and the words on today’s EAST LONDON IDIOTISER were misleading, inaccurate, contradictory and wrong. 4. The contents of the actual item were also disproportionately misleading about the main campaign against the CrossRail assault on the east end, There is no ‘editorial’ ‘journalistic’ ‘ethical’, literary’ ‘textual’, 'conceptual’ informational, technical, technological, perceptional reason why the item could not have been instead about the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign that has gone on in heightened mode over the past three weeks in the context of the four main facets of the campaign events, activities and communications and participations and publications. 5. None of the components of the alleged facts that allegedly made up the alleged row between the crooked clique in control of tower hamlets council at the given, the material and the relevant CrossRail-hole-deal time/s and the crooked CLRL [Cross London Rail Links Ltd] and their co-promoters of the crass crassrail hole project, constituted even a fraction of the substance of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign actions that took place in the six days prior to the publication of this edition of the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER [THURSDAY 29 JUNE 2006] 6. The use of ‘sneaky change of plan’ is indicative of the belief on the part of the ‘editorial’ decision-makers responsible for the main headline and the subheading ‘council in row with CrossRail over ‘devastating’ new sewer plans’ that the rest of the contacts and agreements between the council and CrossRail were straight or that the particular sneaky one was so outrageous and so out of proportion to the rest of the deals and agreements or planning that it caused a ‘legitimate’ ‘row’. 7. The placing of the idea of a ‘row’ also indicates the acceptance on the part of the same decision-makers on the Idiotiser of a marketing line for the crooked tower hamlets council that that council is on the whole and normally above sneaky conduct itself. 8. Whichever - or whatever- construction is taken as based on the actual headline and the display and the use of the word ‘row’ in the context of the item and the publication [not forgetting the trailer posted in streets across the area on Wednesday 28 June 2006] it is inevitable that the impression that the reader would get, the person whose main or the only ‘source’ of ‘news’ about what was going on in the area as covered by the Idiotiser, would be the wrong impression, would be the untrue impression, the inaccurate impression, the impression that would cause a new or add to an old [= existing] deficit of information about the true state of affairs in the area generally and on the matter of the CrossRail hole assault and the role of the CrossRail-hole council in bringing about that assault via CrossRail. 9. The item ‘sneaky change of plan’ is also a gigantic lie for the corrupt tower hamlets council and for the corrupt CLRL [Cross London Rail Links Ltd] and for all the assorted elements of crassrail lies that have plugged away for the crass CrossRail hole attack on the east end. Every single time, the CrossRail hole council and CLRL [Cross London Rail Links Ltd] has acted sneakily. And the main ones KHOODEELAAR! ” has repeatedly drawn to the attention of the el Idiotiser. The Idiotiser has failed to see those and has refused to acknowledge those, as they have failed to acknowledge most of the truth of our campaign. It is a gigantic lie because it suggests that ‘sneak change of plan’ was a one off. 10. Any honest student of economics, as the reporter has described himself as being, would have done their home work and have acquainted themselves with the information on the economic irrelevance of CrossRail that the KHOODEELAAR! Organiser has actually carried out and published over the past 30 months. There is on the record no other commentator on CrossRail that has done so much detailed study of the economic freelance and disbenefits of CrossRail. The lie in the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER’s use is the fact that they have never acknowledged the work on the economic, social and the constitutional unacceptability of the CrossRail plan which the KHOODEELAAR! Organiser has done. One of the analytical and factual points that KHOODEELAAR! has made is that the whole CrossRail plan has been a sneaky affair, from start to finish. And that the deals, the contacts, the communications, the bribery between the tower hamlets council and the CLRL [Cross London Rail Links Ltd] and their co-promoters of the idiotic wasteful scheme.
Ends part 2 of the diagnosis of the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER plug for the CROSSRAIL hole plan liars on TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL Wednesday 29 June 2006
.
[To be continued]
posted by editormuhammadHaque at 11:18 PM
0 comments
